

Creston senior Christian Dorma works on homework while her
teacher David Lyons answers questions. Dorma will be taking
classes this summer at GRCC.(Photo by Stephanie Sicard,Collegiate)
High school
students plan
for next year
By Ashley Eerdmans & Stephanie Sicard
Collegiate Staff Writer & Opinion Editor
With the school year drawing
to a close, high school seniors
face the decision of where to go
next.
In a comparison between two
different high schools, Hastings
High School and Creston High
School, some students are
choosing GRCC while others are
going for a different option.
Billy Diaz, a senior at Creston
High School will be attending
the University of Michigan in
the fall of 2010.
“I’m thinking of probably
getting into medicine,” Diaz
said. “I want to figure out the
programs I can get into that
will let me get into medicine,
but to be a researcher and not a
physician.”
Hastings High School seniors
like Ashley Purdun and Luke
Hubbell have something more
in common than just their high
school. Both students will be
attending GRCC.
“My primary reason for
choosing GRCC was because
it was cheap,” Purdun said. “I’ve heard that there is a really
friendly environment there,
and that it is really easy to get
around. Also, I’m not playing
soccer there because I wanted to
do other things.”
Former Hastings High School
student Andrea Eaton made the
decision two years ago to attend
GRCC after graduation.
“I don’t go to GRCC anymore,
but I chose to go because it was
cheaper than other colleges,” Eaton said.
As for Christian Dorma, a
senior at Creston High School,
GRCC is a summer option.
“I’m going to Michigan State
this fall,” Dorma said. “I’ll be
going to GRCC in the summer
time. I’m going to take a public
speaking course and either a
writing class or English.”
New students are choosing
GRCC each day for many different
reasons. Money, location, and
convenience are all playing roles
in the decision-making.
(Top/Index)
CC Student Congress
looks at green options
By Stephanie Sicard
Opinion Editor
Student Congress is
proposing a resolution to help
control the dependency upon
water bottles at GRCC.
“This is a resolution to
support a change in the drinking
fountains and eliminate the need
for bottled water on campus,” said Jeremy Christensen, GRCC
Student Congress President.
The proposed plan is not to
ban bottled water on campus,
but to promote the use of
students bringing their own
reusable bottles and filling them
at stations around campus. The
drinking fountains would be
equipped with a water filtration system to purify the tap water.
Nicholas Wikar, GRCC Student Congress Vice
President said, “We’d like to get GRCC to pass out
reusable water bottles instead of T-shirts at campus
events.”
The Board of Trustees will vote on the resolution,
currently titled the Bottled Water Resolution, on
April 22.
According to Student Congress, seven other
universities and colleges throughout the United
States have banned the sell of bottled water on their
campuses.
An additional 30 colleges and universities, one
of which is Grand Valley State University, have
created campaigns to reduce the use of bottled
water on campus.
“This isn’t a ban on bottled water on campus,” said Wikar. “We just want to encourage change,
and help students become aware of the waste.”
If the resolution passes, Student Congress
hopes reduce GRCC’s dependency on bottled water
sales, and therefore reduce to the amount of plastic
sent to landfills.
(Top/Index)
Speak Out! Have something to say? Sound off to The Collegiate at grcc_collegiate@yahoo.com for your tips or views on the current news, sports, arts & entertainment and opinion.
Letters to the editors: The Collegiate is very interested in your opinions, so send your letters in. The
basic premise of journalism centers on the long-standing tradition of providing an
open forum and a free press. Please write to the Collegiate with your opinion.
You can drop off your letters in room 339 Main building, or you can e-mail them
to GRCC_Collegiate@yahoo.com. Please include your name and phone number
for proper verification.
Letters are subject to editing for spelling, grammar, and length. |